Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore unspecified addresses from zeroconf #81620

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2022

Conversation

bdraco
Copy link
Member

@bdraco bdraco commented Nov 5, 2022

Proposed change

Some devices include 0.0.0.0 in their addresses. We need to ignore these addresses as they are invalid

see issue #81590 (A seperate fix for homekit_controller is in #81621)

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New integration (thank you!)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
  • Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
    Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
    Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
  • Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

Some devices include 0.0.0.0 in their addresses. We
need to ignore these addresses as they are invalid

see issue home-assistant#81590 (A seperate fix for homekit_controller will come in another PR)
@@ -552,12 +552,20 @@ def _first_non_link_local_address(
"""Return the first ipv6 or non-link local ipv4 address, preferring IPv4."""
for address in addresses:
ip_addr = ip_address(address)
if not ip_addr.is_link_local and ip_addr.version == 4:
if (
not ip_addr.is_link_local
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we ignoring link-local addresses? That's a valid IP address in the context of discovering stuff in the LAN.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code only orders the ip addresses to present the one we can most likely connect to first. All of them are still accessible as addresses

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK. First non link local address. Understood.

@@ -552,12 +552,20 @@ def _first_non_link_local_address(
"""Return the first ipv6 or non-link local ipv4 address, preferring IPv4."""
for address in addresses:
ip_addr = ip_address(address)
if not ip_addr.is_link_local and ip_addr.version == 4:
if (
not ip_addr.is_link_local
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK. First non link local address. Understood.

@bdraco
Copy link
Member Author

bdraco commented Nov 7, 2022

Thanks

@bdraco bdraco merged commit 5c38321 into home-assistant:dev Nov 7, 2022
@bdraco bdraco deleted the ignore_0000 branch November 7, 2022 21:50
@frenck frenck mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 9, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants