Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added code coverage reporting #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2019
Merged

Conversation

wrmilling
Copy link
Member

What was a problem?

Missing specific reporting on code coverage for the repo.

How this PR fixes the problem?

Adds a basic CodeCov report for the repo. Also added a few basic badges for the readme.

Check lists

  • Test passed
  • [ZX] Coding style (indentation, etc)

Additional Comments (if any)

N/A

Also added a few badges for the repo
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@211d245). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master       #3   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   97.56%           
=========================================
  Files             ?        5           
  Lines             ?       82           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?       80           
  Misses            ?        2           
  Partials          ?        0

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 211d245...1017f02. Read the comment docs.

@wrmilling wrmilling merged commit d18ddee into master May 20, 2019
@wrmilling wrmilling deleted the add-code-coverage-report branch May 20, 2019 13:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants