Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a dogecointip module a la bitcointip #826

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mathphreak
Copy link

Most of the work was just s/bit/doge/.

Not everything that bitcointip has is applicable here, mostly because the bitcointip bot has an API that dogetipbot doesn't. Also, some of the stuff that works in bitcointip doesn't work here for some reason:

  • Automatically hiding bot verifications doesn't work for some weird reason, even though it's the same exact code bitcointip uses.
  • Address detection doesn't work either for some reason, although it looks like the only point of that was finding the deposit address.

Automatically hiding bot verifications doesn't work for some weird
reason, even though it's the same exact code `bitcointip` uses.

Address detection doesn't work either for some reason, although it looks
like the only point of that was finding the deposit address.
@honestbleeps
Copy link
Owner

I appreciate the contribution! I do want to hold off on merging though, because /u/skeeto who already created the bitcointip module may help out by working to incorporate dogetipbot into his... I would prefer from a cleanliness/organization standpoint that we not have multiple modules, though I'll leave this open for now until we have a concrete decision...

@mathphreak
Copy link
Author

Sounds good!

@honestbleeps
Copy link
Owner

@kevinji
Copy link
Collaborator

kevinji commented Aug 29, 2014

Going to close this in lieu of a (to be made) more broad fix to #868.

@kevinji kevinji closed this Aug 29, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants