Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

remove ruby-wiki-tracing example #117

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2022
Merged

remove ruby-wiki-tracing example #117

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2022

Conversation

vreynolds
Copy link
Contributor

@vreynolds vreynolds requested a review from a team November 7, 2022 22:58
@vreynolds vreynolds self-assigned this Nov 7, 2022
@vreynolds vreynolds added version: no bump A PR with maintenance or doc changes that aren't included in a release. type: maintenance The necessary chores to keep the dust off. merge at will Reviewer can merge the PR once reviewed. no-changelog Omit this PR from changelog/release notes. labels Nov 7, 2022
cartermp
cartermp approved these changes Nov 7, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@cartermp cartermp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So many different file endings for ruby

@vreynolds vreynolds merged commit f2dbdcd into main Nov 8, 2022
@vreynolds vreynolds deleted the vera.delete-ruby-wiki-tracing branch November 8, 2022 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@cartermp cartermp cartermp approved these changes

Assignees

@vreynolds vreynolds

Labels
merge at will Reviewer can merge the PR once reviewed. no-changelog Omit this PR from changelog/release notes. type: maintenance The necessary chores to keep the dust off. version: no bump A PR with maintenance or doc changes that aren't included in a release.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@vreynolds @cartermp