Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

activation pages on website #7

Closed
mikelmaron opened this issue Jul 30, 2013 · 8 comments
Closed

activation pages on website #7

mikelmaron opened this issue Jul 30, 2013 · 8 comments

Comments

@mikelmaron
Copy link
Collaborator

We should also have some pages on the site that list the current
activations, the current projects we are mapping on that aren't
activations, and the countries where we have ground teams currently
working.

@skorasaurus
Copy link

I started some of that a few weeks ago on the hot wiki page. should be on both website and wiki page, i suppose.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOT#Initiatives_on_the_Ground

Not sure how you want to break it ... by country, by time (a list of whether an activation is current or not), and

another way of displaying this info could be on a map like @MappingKat 's map (on the HOT mailing list, iirc within the past week or 2).

@xamanu
Copy link
Contributor

xamanu commented Dec 2, 2013

We could mark projects as "active" projects. And present them in a special way. A map sounds nice, and the block on the front page which shows projects could be switched to "projects that need your participation"....

@mikelmaron
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sounds like that could work. We also should distinguish projects which are disaster preparation projects vs emergencies. Both can be active, and require participation, but the emergencies should be highlighted more urgently.

@ifrik
Copy link

ifrik commented Dec 3, 2013

We could add flags to flag up emergencies. I thought I had installed them already to flag up the featured project but that apparently got lost when xamanu re-did the views.

@xamanu
Copy link
Contributor

xamanu commented Dec 3, 2013

The flags module has never been in the code base. Anyway, as we have preparation projects, emergencies and maybe more classification in the future it might make sense to use (multiple) taxonomies for "type of project" or something like that. This way we also stay with the already installed modules. What do you think?

@mikelmaron
Copy link
Collaborator Author

taxonomy makes sense to me

@ifrik
Copy link

ifrik commented Dec 5, 2013

Okay that makes sense. Somebody should have a look at the current projects to decide which types make sense and then we can add the vocabulary and assign the right tag to each of them in one go.

@xamanu
Copy link
Contributor

xamanu commented Dec 4, 2014

Closing as it is further being discussed here: hotosm/hotosm-website#21

@xamanu xamanu closed this as completed Dec 4, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants