Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stimulus and om99 #43

Closed
GrosSacASac opened this issue Jan 6, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

stimulus and om99 #43

GrosSacASac opened this issue Jan 6, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@GrosSacASac
Copy link

I read through all of stimulus handbook (is there something else to read ?), and wow I am surprised it feels like we invented almost the same thing without knowing.

dom99 github
dom99 docs

stimulus - dom99

data-controller is like data-inside
data-target : data-element
data-action : data-function

is there something like data-list also ?
and data-template ?

noted differences, stimulus encourages to use a controller and put many things inside of it while dom99 approach is to let the developer structure components however he/she wants.

The docs of stimulus seems way better and more up to date and more concise.

I recommend putting npm install stimulus explicitly written out here https://github.com/stimulusjs/stimulus/blob/master/INSTALLING.md after the first sentence.

Thoughts ?

@javan
Copy link
Contributor

javan commented Jan 8, 2018

is there something like data-list also ? and data-template ?

There is not.

I recommend putting npm install stimulus explicitly written out here

We'd rather not suggest using npm install over yarn install. People already familiar with npm packages will know what to do, and we go into more detail in the handbook.


Thanks for checking out Stimulus!

@javan javan closed this as completed Jan 8, 2018
@GrosSacASac
Copy link
Author

I wasn't sure if it was npm install stimulusjs or stimulus, so I had to follow a link to know it.

javan added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 8, 2018
@javan
Copy link
Contributor

javan commented Jan 8, 2018

I see, thanks. Clarified in 48219cf.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants