Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPCC-23224 Clarify expireDays topic in docs #13261

Conversation

JamesDeFabia
Copy link
Contributor

@JamesDeFabia JamesDeFabia commented Jan 8, 2020

Signed-off-by: Jim DeFabia jamesdefabia@lexisnexis.com
@AttilaVamos Please review

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Smoketest:

  • Send notifications about my Pull Request position in Smoketest queue.
  • Test my draft Pull Request.

Testing:

Signed-off-by: Jim DeFabia <jamesdefabia@lexisnexis.com>
@hpcc-jirabot
Copy link

@HPCCSmoketest
Copy link
Contributor

Automated Smoketest: ✅
OS: centos 7.6.1810 (Linux 3.10.0-327.28.3.el7.x86_64)
GCC:gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180303 (Red Hat 7.3.1-5)
Sha: df0c9c6
Build: success
Build: success
Install HPCC Platform
HPCC Start: OK
HPCC Stop: OK
Time stats:

Prep time Build time Package time Install time Start time Test time Stop time Summary
45 sec (00:00:45) 390 sec (00:06:30) 0 sec (00:00:00) 28 sec (00:00:28) 20 sec (00:00:20) 0 sec (00:00:00) 16 sec (00:00:16) 499 sec (00:08:19)

Copy link
Contributor

@AttilaVamos AttilaVamos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@JamesDeFabia It seems ok

@richardkchapman richardkchapman merged commit 73a182c into hpcc-systems:candidate-7.6.x Jan 13, 2020
@JamesDeFabia JamesDeFabia deleted the HPCC-23224expireDays branch April 22, 2020 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
5 participants