Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Editorial: 6265bis should explain ASCII and LDH in terminology #1979

Closed
johannhof opened this issue Feb 17, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Editorial: 6265bis should explain ASCII and LDH in terminology #1979

johannhof opened this issue Feb 17, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@johannhof
Copy link
Collaborator

There are recurring mentions of these in the cookies spec and #1969 is adding some more, so this should probably be in the terminology.

@johannhof
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Looking at this again ASCII is referenced as [USASCII] everywhere which seems fine, and (NR-)LDH is only mentioned and also referenced once in https://httpwg.org/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis.html#section-5.1.2.

I think we can close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants