Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proxy and .pac interaction #62

Closed
martinthomson opened this issue Apr 3, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

Proxy and .pac interaction #62

martinthomson opened this issue Apr 3, 2015 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@martinthomson
Copy link
Contributor

Ryan asks what you should pass to proxy.pac when you know about a potential alt-svc.

I suggested that you use the original request origin and only use alternatives if the proxy.pac doesn't provide a proxy address. That is proxy.pac overrides alternative services.

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Apr 7, 2015

Yeah. Alt-Sv is for finding an origin, not for finding a proxy -- a proxy might use it, though.

This should all be clear based upon reading of RFC7230, but if not we could add a sentence or two to clarify.

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor

reschke commented Apr 30, 2015

Is there something we need to do here?

@RolandZink
Copy link

Maybe we need to specify an alternative to pac files or define how to
get a proxy for http over TLS in pac.

Regards,
Roland

On 30.04.2015 16:31, Julian Reschke wrote:

Is there something we need to do here?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#62 (comment).

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented May 1, 2015

For this spec, I think we could just add a sentence to the effect that 'clients configured to use a proxy SHOULD NOT use alternative services."

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Jun 9, 2015

Add: "A client configured to use a proxy for a given request SHOULD NOT send it to an alternative service, but instead use that proxy."

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Jun 16, 2015

Modification: "A client configured to use a proxy for a given request SHOULD NOT directly connect to an alternative service for it, but instead route it through that proxy."

@reschke
Copy link
Contributor

reschke commented Jun 21, 2015

(seems the discussion on the mailing list hasn't come to a conclusion)

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Jul 20, 2015

It did regarding this issue, I think; the remaining discussion is a tangent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants