Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Appendix B (comment 33) #1069

Closed
mnot opened this issue Mar 22, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1099
Closed

Appendix B (comment 33) #1069

mnot opened this issue Mar 22, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1099
Labels
auth48

Comments

@mnot
Copy link
Member

mnot commented Mar 22, 2022

Appendix B: Will "successor signaling" be clear to
readers? We don't see "successor signaling" in
draft-ietf-httpbis-priority or any published RFC, and we don't see
the word "successor" in draft-ietf-httpbis-priority.

Original:

 Using
 the simpler successor signaling [I-D.ietf-httpbis-priority] is
 recommended.
@mnot mnot added the auth48 label Mar 22, 2022
martinthomson added a commit to martinthomson/http2v2 that referenced this issue Mar 22, 2022
@martinthomson
Simpler signaling
a363918 
Closes httpwg#1069.
@martinthomson martinthomson mentioned this issue Mar 22, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
auth48
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Simpler signaling martinthomson/http2v2
1 participant
@mnot