Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/open id connect web service plugin #145

Conversation

petermetz
Copy link
Member

@petermetz petermetz commented May 22, 2020

Note: there's also smaller improvements to CI/build speed, developer experience, not just the OIDC integration.

  • Persistence layer for users/tokens/sessions/etc. - Knex config parameters and factory
  • HTTPS support without having to run a reverse proxy, load balancer (this is a chore, but necessary if we want to keep it simple to try out the software)

…r the BIF -> Cactus rename

Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
The loosely typed "options" property had validation issues when passed in through a config file.

Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
…g the SDK generated in pretsc

This way the generated SDK code gets reflected in the tsc compilation process

Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
perf(ci-sh): uses npm ci instead of npm install which is designed for CI environments and therefore
is slightly faster.

Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
… to speed builds up

caching is no magic bullet so we will have to monitor how this affects developer flow on the long
run and if theres any annoying side effects with cached builds hanging around longer than they
should be (e.g. cache invalidation fail)

Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
There is a passing test with a code flow, but the implicit
flow with the cockpit is still work in progress.

Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
… view of test coverage

Before this, tests were executed on a per package level and dumped their coverage report somewhere
in the middle of the process, individually. After this you get a unified report at the very end
showing the total coverage across all packages.

Signed-off-by: Peter Somogyvari <peter.somogyvari@accenture.com>
@petermetz petermetz added the enhancement New feature or request label May 22, 2020
@petermetz petermetz self-assigned this May 22, 2020
@petermetz petermetz marked this pull request as draft May 22, 2020 08:09
@petermetz petermetz closed this May 24, 2020
@petermetz
Copy link
Member Author

Will open another one a little later today/tomorrow

ryjones pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
Augmenting Fabric Interop Chaincode Libraries
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant