Resend tx when it fails on ethereum

[NickSneo]

Checklist

• A link to the issue/user story that the pull request relates to
• How to recreate the problem without the fix
• Design of the fix
• How to prove that the fix works
• Automated tests that prove the fix keeps on working
• Documentation - any JSDoc, website, or Stackoverflow answers?

Issue/User story

Steps to Reproduce

Existing issues

• Stack Overflow issues
• GitHub Issues
• Discord history

Design of the fix

Validation of the fix

Automated Tests

What documentation has been provided for this pull request

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1506 (755d260) into main (8cef10c) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 755d260 differs from pull request most recent head 639154e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 639154e to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1506   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.89%   55.89%           
=======================================
  Files         105      105           
  Lines        4507     4507           
  Branches      688      688           
=======================================
  Hits         2519     2519           
  Misses       1435     1435           
  Partials      553      553           

Flag	Coverage Δ
caliper-core	44.98% <ø> (ø)
caliper-fabric	80.46% <ø> (ø)
generator-caliper	83.62% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[davidkel]

I'm not sure what this will achieve, caliper is designed to track success and failure of individual transations so why mark it as a failure then retry ? Also there is the potential for this to resend repeatedly as there is no logic to limit the amount of resend sent before failing completely.

If you could raise an isssue to discuss the particular issue you are seeing and the benefit/reasoning behind resending the transaction on a failure (rather than having workloads handle this for example) then it it can be moved forward but as it stands I don't think this change is appropriate.

[davidkel]

Closing as no response from submitter