Transaction status events tested for each of 7 peers

[e-ivkov]

Signed-off-by: Egor Ivkov e.o.ivkov@gmail.com

Description of the Change

Transaction status events are tested:

• By connecting for events to each peer
• By submitting transactions in turn to each peer

Issue

#1492

Benefits

Thoroughly testing potential bug cases described in the issue.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1631 (b49254b) into iroha2-dev (3285d53) will increase coverage by 1.11%.
The diff coverage is 98.78%.

❗ Current head b49254b differs from pull request most recent head 8f6f77a. Consider uploading reports for the commit 8f6f77a to get more accurate results

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           iroha2-dev    #1631      +/-   ##
==============================================
+ Coverage       74.75%   75.86%   +1.11%     
==============================================
  Files             120      119       -1     
  Lines           19803    19671     -132     
==============================================
+ Hits            14803    14923     +120     
+ Misses           5000     4748     -252     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
client/tests/tests/events.rs	98.79% <98.70%> (-1.21%)	⬇️
core/src/sumeragi/mod.rs	88.66% <100.00%> (+6.08%)	⬆️
core/test_network/src/lib.rs	74.82% <100.00%> (-1.28%)	⬇️
p2p/src/network.rs	78.94% <100.00%> (ø)
actor/src/lib.rs	81.87% <0.00%> (-0.33%)	⬇️
crypto/src/lib.rs	89.54% <0.00%> (-0.11%)	⬇️
core/src/lib.rs	62.11% <0.00%> (ø)
client/src/lib.rs	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 20 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3285d53...8f6f77a. Read the comment docs.

[mversic]

funny thing, these array locations are not accessed concurrently, each thread accesses different index. But that would be a pain to express correctly

[mversic]

yes, you can have:

const INIT: AtomicBool = AtomicBool::new(false);
let rejected_event_received = Arc::new([INIT; PEER_COUNT]); 

if you think that's worth the trouble for this test?

[e-ivkov]

I think it doesn't matter here that much as it's just a test.