-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Point to NotANumber blog for another idea how to create cone mirror.
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
14 additions
and
8 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
333bb2e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Henner - I'm curious, have you considered trying these cone shaped reflectors used in lighting? Obviously there are many varieties!
333bb2e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea. No I have not considered that, but I did build a cone mirror using an acrylic first-surface mirror that I forced into the right shape after heating it. I think after a bit of refining, that technique can be pretty reproducible.
I think I posted a bunch of images to Google+ back then, but these are all gone now :/
333bb2e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok I just ordered an aluminum cone reflector and will try it! Also good to know heat forming of mirrored acrylic is also promising.
333bb2e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference this is a 6” HALO 426. It would be nice if it works since it is a mass produced part. The aluminum surface is quite smooth in quality although could be polished further. I will try cutting a vertical slit.
As an aside - do you happen to have any extra of the driver PCBs or made any updates? I hope to get this working and set it up at Noisebridge.
333bb2e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks like it needs some polishing, indeed. And it needs to be a cone with exactly 45 degrees, this looks almost straight.
So, if you're at Noisebridge ... maybe we should meet, as I am local in SF (I actually made the laser-cut encasing on the Noisebridge laser cutter...).
I did some updates, but don't know if I have still PCBs. I can bring some parts and various proto-type intermediate stages that we can play with when we meet. Mail me at h.zeller@acm.org
333bb2e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, the cone needs to be exactly 45 degrees. You can calculate the Rayleigh length for a given spot diameter via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh_length. This determines how perfect your cone has to follow a circle.
From the distance from the cone to the exposure plane and geometry, you can calculate the impact of angular deviations.
A further complexity is the cross scan error. Each facet is tilted slightly differently. How did you solve this @hzeller, did you use one facet?
I am still impressed by your litho results.
The problem I have with this approach is that the mirror can be seen as a lens and will become more expensive if you target higher resolutions.
The argument this is cheaper than f-theta lens is not clear to me.
The prism I use now cost 20 USD a piece.