Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update gulp-babel to version 6.1.2 πŸš€ #535

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello πŸ‘‹

πŸš€πŸš€πŸš€

gulp-babel just published its new version 6.1.2, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of gulp-babel – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 18 commits .

  • f7d6e35 6.1.2
  • 15dff34 simplify #74
  • 6c7a310 Close #74 PR: Don't add '.js' extension if the source file doesn't have an extension.
  • fe5908e Merge pull request #70 from d10/readme-fix
  • 3a23dec Fix minor error in readme.
  • fbe4889 6.1.1
  • 336d6ac Merge pull request #61 from Pofigizm/sourcemap-bug
  • e20842d Fix sourcemap's bug for files in nested folders. Closes #54
  • 40815c1 6.1.0
  • 1e79d98 Close #51 PR: Don't rename ignored files.
  • f468b34 Update readme.md
  • 8392545 6.0.0
  • 39e81e0 tweaks
  • 94addac Close #46 PR: chore: update babel-core to 6.0.2.
  • 8db5d87 5.3.0

There are 18 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚑

@jamuhl jamuhl closed this Feb 3, 2016
@jamuhl jamuhl deleted the greenkeeper-gulp-babel-6.1.2 branch October 6, 2016 10:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants