Modify JWT Serializer Field Names

[Dresdn]

Closes #142

This change modifies the JWTSerializer fields to be access and response to align with the naming of rest_framework_jwt.serializers.TokenRefreshSerializer

With rest_framework_simplejwt being tightly coupled into the JWT usage, this made sense to adhere to the upstream dependency naming standards.

Ultimately, it's ugly when using JWT to check for access_token names when authenticating, and then using access for a refresh.

[zackkh]

Greetings ! While you're at it, can you add refresh_expiration field to dj_rest_auth.jwt_auth.get_refresh_view's response data since we are already returning an access expiration timestamp ?

def get_refresh_view():
    """ Returns a Token Refresh CBV without a circular import """
    from rest_framework_simplejwt.settings import api_settings as jwt_settings
    from rest_framework_simplejwt.views import TokenRefreshView

    class RefreshViewWithCookieSupport(TokenRefreshView):
        serializer_class = CookieTokenRefreshSerializer

        def finalize_response(self, request, response, *args, **kwargs):
            if response.status_code == status.HTTP_200_OK and 'access' in response.data:
                set_jwt_access_cookie(response, response.data['access'])
                response.data['access_expiration'] = (timezone.now() + jwt_settings.ACCESS_TOKEN_LIFETIME)
            if response.status_code == status.HTTP_200_OK and 'refresh' in response.data:
                set_jwt_refresh_cookie(response, response.data['refresh'])
                response.data['refresh_expiration'] = (timezone.now() + jwt_settings.REFRESH_TOKEN_LIFETIME)
            return super().finalize_response(request, response, *args, **kwargs)
    return RefreshViewWithCookieSupport

[Dresdn]

Good call @zackkh. I saw that but didn't dawn on me to include it. Let me know if there's anything else to be done.

[zackkh]

Changes are 5/5 and match up with djangorestframework-simplejwt.