docs: update an example's link #3514
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks so much for catching this issue! Really appreciate the PR :) |
thallada
pushed a commit
to considerhq/slate
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2020
pzhine
pushed a commit
to databyss-org/slate
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2020
lukesmurray
pushed a commit
to lukesmurray/slate
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "hovering menu" example doesn't exists. Instead, there's an example called "hovering toolbar". So I update the link to that example.
Is this adding or improving a feature or fixing a bug?
Nope.
What's the new behavior?
Nope.
How does this change work?
I just fixed an unreachable link.
Have you checked that...?
yarn test.yarn lint. (Fix errors withyarn fix.)yarn start.)Does this fix any issues or need any specific reviewers?
No.