Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade prop-types from 15.7.2 to 15.8.1 #214

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mjperrins
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade prop-types from 15.7.2 to 15.8.1.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 2 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on 2 years ago.

Issues fixed by the recommended upgrade:

Issue Score Exploit Maturity
high severity Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JS-URLPARSE-2407770
372 Proof of Concept
medium severity Open Redirect
SNYK-JS-URLPARSE-1533425
372 Proof of Concept
medium severity Access Restriction Bypass
SNYK-JS-URLPARSE-2401205
372 Proof of Concept
medium severity Authorization Bypass
SNYK-JS-URLPARSE-2407759
372 Proof of Concept
medium severity Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
SNYK-JS-URLPARSE-2412697
372 Proof of Concept
Release notes
Package name: prop-types
  • 15.8.1 - 2022-01-05
    • [Fix] fix crash when a custom propType return lacks .data; call hasOwnProperty properly (#370)
    • [meta] Fix formatting in CHANGELOG.md (#367)
    • [Tests] add missing test coverage (#370)
    • [Tests] convert normal it functions to arrow functions (#370)
    • [Tests] do not fail fast; add react 17 (#366)
    • [Dev Deps] update eslint
  • 15.8.0 - 2021-12-22
    • [New] add PropTypes.bigint (#365)
    • [New] oneOfType: Add expected types to warning (#198)
    • [New] Add type check for validator for 'shape' and 'exact' (#234)
    • [Fix] checkPropTypes: Friendlier message when using a type checker that is not a function (#51)
    • [Refactor] extract has (#261, #125, #124)
    • [readme] Fix branch name (master -> main) (#364)
    • [readme] Clarify usage of elementType (#335)
    • [docs] highlighted the func name (#321)
    • [docs] Typo fix in example (#300)
    • [docs] Add instructions for intentional inclusion of validation in production. (#262)
    • [docs] PropTypes.node: add link to react docs
    • [docs] Improve wording for checkPropTypes (#258)
    • [meta] Add a package sideEffects field. (#350)
    • [meta] use in-publish to avoid running the build on install
    • [deps] regenerate yarn.lock
    • [deps] update react-is (#347, #346, #345, #340, #338)
    • [eslint] enable some rules (#360)
    • [Tests] Use GH Actions (#363)
    • [Tests] Fix spelling (#318)
    • [Tests] Fixed typo: 'Any type should accept any value' (#281)
    • [Tests] fix broken tests; test the build process
    • [Dev Deps] update browserify, bundle-collapser, eslint, in-publish, react, uglifyify, uglifyjs
  • 15.7.2 - 2019-02-13

    v15.7.2

from prop-types GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade prop-types from 15.7.2 to 15.8.1.

See this package in npm:
prop-types

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/mjperrins/project/8b997414-ee04-4e8c-9878-ecd967f4885f?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants