Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Upgrade arrow to 46 #164

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 28, 2023

Conversation

liurenjie1024
Copy link
Contributor

@liurenjie1024 liurenjie1024 commented Aug 28, 2023

Fix the bug in split offsets.

Close #160

Copy link
Contributor

@Xuanwo Xuanwo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@@ -14,15 +14,15 @@ members = [
anyhow = "1"
async-trait = "0.1"
apache-avro = { version = "0.15", features = ["derive"] }
arrow = { version = ">=40, <47" }
arrow = { version = "46" }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We must use 46 here? This could affect our users with other versions.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, only 46 contains this fix. BTW, is it really a good choice to use range for arrow? IIUC, arrow doesn't guarantee portability cross major versions.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The correctness of the arrow API is guaranteed by arrow maintainer and endusers, and Icelake is just to ensure that it can compile in this case. Maybe we can use >=46 instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree, I will fix it.

@liurenjie1024 liurenjie1024 merged commit c07e4f1 into icelake-io:main Aug 28, 2023
3 checks passed
@liurenjie1024 liurenjie1024 deleted the renjie/issue-160 branch August 28, 2023 07:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Upgrade arrow 46.0.0
2 participants