-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: Upgrade arrow to 46 #164
chore: Upgrade arrow to 46 #164
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
@@ -14,15 +14,15 @@ members = [ | |||
anyhow = "1" | |||
async-trait = "0.1" | |||
apache-avro = { version = "0.15", features = ["derive"] } | |||
arrow = { version = ">=40, <47" } | |||
arrow = { version = "46" } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We must use 46
here? This could affect our users with other versions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, only 46
contains this fix. BTW, is it really a good choice to use range for arrow? IIUC, arrow doesn't guarantee portability cross major versions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The correctness of the arrow API is guaranteed by arrow maintainer and endusers, and Icelake is just to ensure that it can compile in this case. Maybe we can use >=46
instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, I will fix it.
Fix the bug in split offsets.
Close #160