Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the platform-maestro file_centric mapping #559

Closed
1 task
rosibaj opened this issue Sep 10, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed
1 task

Update the platform-maestro file_centric mapping #559

rosibaj opened this issue Sep 10, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@rosibaj
Copy link
Contributor

rosibaj commented Sep 10, 2020

Using the mapping from this ticket: icgc-argo/argo-metadata-schemas#41

  • update the Argo instance of maestro to the to use the latest mapping

Exit Criteria

Fields can be seen in ES documents (not populated with data)

@Buwujiu
Copy link

Buwujiu commented Sep 14, 2020

Updated file_centric_1.0 in argo dev and qa.

@Buwujiu Buwujiu closed this as completed Sep 22, 2020
@rosibaj rosibaj reopened this Sep 22, 2020
@rosibaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

rosibaj commented Sep 22, 2020

@Buwujiu this has not yet been in production so reopening.

@blabadi blabadi added the v0.1 label Sep 28, 2020
@blabadi
Copy link

blabadi commented Sep 29, 2020

deferred to next release due to : overture-stack/arranger#615

@rosibaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

rosibaj commented Oct 9, 2020

@hlminh2000 we had issuess with the data release again (discussed in sprint planning), so i will again hold this from release

@hlminh2000
Copy link

ok I did not do anything fr this ticket for now.

@rosibaj
Copy link
Contributor Author

rosibaj commented Oct 22, 2020

@blabadi i think we probably still dont want to do this as we have not released - should we close this ticket in favour of an index update later with the release-management changes?

@blabadi blabadi closed this as completed Oct 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants