Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Need a way to differentiate between "Transient" executioners and "Power Method" executioners #2452

Closed
friedmud opened this issue Feb 14, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Need a way to differentiate between "Transient" executioners and "Power Method" executioners #2452

friedmud opened this issue Feb 14, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
C: Framework P: normal A defect affecting operation with a low possibility of significantly affects. T: task An enhancement to the software.

Comments

@friedmud
Copy link
Contributor

Right now we are using a single flag in Problem called transient which is being used for both types. This causes issues when an error or condition needs to be checked against one or the other. See

yak/src/common/materials/Adjoint_FsrcMaterial.C

@YaqiWang
@ghost ghost assigned permcody Feb 14, 2014
@YaqiWang YaqiWang mentioned this issue Mar 28, 2014
Closed
@permcody permcody removed their assignment Apr 14, 2014
@permcody
Copy link
Member

This issue has been solved through the introduction of a new intermediate base class called EigenExecutionerBase and derived types.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
C: Framework P: normal A defect affecting operation with a low possibility of significantly affects. T: task An enhancement to the software.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@friedmud @permcody