Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert mark mortar constraint variable as active in fe_problem #21312

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2022

Conversation

recuero
Copy link
Contributor

@recuero recuero commented Jun 15, 2022

These lines of code make assessment cases leveraging mortar constraints to model gap heat transfer fail. It appears that problem variables (temperature) are not properly initialized when reinitializing face materials (e.g. creep/thermal expansion) from the mortar constraint loop. The ultimate cause of this issue is not known to me, but it's not straightforward to reproduce in a MOOSE regression test unfortunately.

Tagging @lindsayad who has more insight into what the cause can be.

Refs #19444.

…lab#19444)

These lines of code make assessment cases leveraging mortar constraints to
model gap heat transfer. It appears that problem variables (temperature) are
not properly intitialized when reinitializing face materials from the mortar
constraint loop. The ultimate cause of this issue is not known, but it's not
straightforward to reproduce in a MOOSE regression test.
@recuero recuero changed the title Revert mark mortar constraint variable as active in fe_problem (#19444) Revert mark mortar constraint variable as active in fe_problem Jun 15, 2022
@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

Job Documentation on 755c9ed wanted to post the following:

View the site here

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@moosebuild
Copy link
Contributor

Job Coverage on 755c9ed wanted to post the following:

Framework coverage

ae3ac9 #21312 755c9e
Total Total +/- New
Rate 83.42% 83.42% -0.00% -
Hits 77388 77382 -6 0
Misses 15378 15379 +1 0

Diff coverage report

Full coverage report

Modules coverage

Coverage did not change

Full coverage reports

Reports

This comment will be updated on new commits.

@recuero recuero requested a review from lindsayad June 15, 2022 22:55
Copy link
Member

@lindsayad lindsayad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yea this doesn't get variable dependencies of materials, so I can see that this would cause issues. When I have more time I'll get all the dependencies correct, but just reiniting all is fine for now

@recuero recuero merged commit ad2d41e into idaholab:next Jun 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants