-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About the paper #25
Comments
is there something more specific that you're struggling with? is there a specific equation? |
This figure still doesn't clarify the issue for me -- is there a concrete
part that you don't understand about the last dilation-1 layer? like all
the other layers it takes the previous layer as input.
…On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:58 AM marc88 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello Emma,
The figure shows notations used to derive the layers as given in the paper.
I have some confusion in the last dilation-1 layer's notation. Hope this
image below is suggestive enough. Please feel free if any more information
is required.
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42137058/49851762-20e6f300-fe08-11e8-862f-538a81eeaffe.png>
Thanks
Regards
Surojit
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#25 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADHZtyCB6fqpbWby-6IWgc-Bc9K2EFHjks5u4KkrgaJpZM4ZMoZQ>
.
|
Ok! I do understand that every block has exponentially increasing dilation layers followed by a dilation 1 layer and we can have multiple such blocks :) |
it looks good to me
…On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:23 AM Surojit Sengupta ***@***.***> wrote:
Ok!
Please forget everything else and just suggest if the layers upto c(5)
have been formulated properly in the image above? :)
I am confused about the notations but, it won’t matter if the layers I’ve
formulated are done correctly.
I do understand that every block has exponentially increasing dilation
layers followed by a dilation 1 layer and we can have multiple suck blocks
:)
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#25 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADHZtwsPFPNoxoXoVUiFPoIVjtpSsbOAks5u4nENgaJpZM4ZMoZQ>
.
|
Thank you so much! :) |
Hello,
Is there any suggested reading that you'd recommend to understand your paper. I tried working through the architecture but, while using the expression for the final Dilation layer of the block, I found some points of confusion.
Please suggest further if any additional information is required.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: