Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I-D text update resolving #150, #151, and #157 #152

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023
Merged

Conversation

This I-D update resolves:

- #150
- #151

+ pure editorial updates/corrections

Co-Authored-By: Esther Le Rouzic <EstherLerouzic@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Gabriele Galimberti <ggalimbe56@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: sergio belotti <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>
Co-Authored-By: italobusi <12461741+italobusi@users.noreply.github.com>
This I-D update addesses:

- #144 : some comments resolved
- #153 : new DGE sub-section added
- #154 : latest YANG code and tree view incorporated

+ pure editorial updates/corrections

Co-Authored-By: Esther Le Rouzic <EstherLerouzic@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: sergio belotti <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>
Co-Authored-By: italobusi <12461741+italobusi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Gabriele Galimberti <ggalimbe56@gmail.com>
This I-D update resolves:

- #157 : Examples of how vendors can define their operational modes.

+ pure editorial updates/corrections

Co-Authored-By: Esther Le Rouzic <EstherLerouzic@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: sergio belotti <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>
Co-Authored-By: italobusi <12461741+italobusi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Gabriele Galimberti <ggalimbe56@gmail.com>
@dieterbeller dieterbeller changed the title I-D text update resolving #150 and #151 I-D text update resolving #150, #151, and #157 Oct 23, 2023
@dieterbeller dieterbeller merged commit 9e756dd into master Oct 23, 2023
1 of 2 checks passed
@dieterbeller dieterbeller deleted the I-D-14-prep branch October 23, 2023 12:34
Copy link
Collaborator

@EstherLerouzic EstherLerouzic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello, I think that the type of delta_power should not be gain

@@ -2886,7 +2941,7 @@ module: ietf-optical-impairment-topology
| +--ro otsi-ref* []
| | +--ro otsi-carrier-ref? leafref
| | +--ro e2e-mc-path-ref* leafref
| +--ro delta-power? l0-types:power-in-dbm-or-null
| +--ro delta-power? l0-types:gain-in-db-or-null
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

delta-power contains a ratio in dB. one may call it gain, however gain is only positive, where delta_p could be negative. so the type should be changed

| +--ro flexi-m?
| | l0-types:flexi-m
| +--ro delta-power?
| l0-types:gain-in-db-or-\
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same comment

@@ -3823,7 +3937,7 @@ module ietf-optical-impairment-topology {
}
}
leaf delta-power {
type l0-types:power-in-dbm-or-null;
type l0-types:gain-in-db-or-null;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants