Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support using allowing and rejecting together on content type matcher #172

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 22, 2022

Conversation

mvz
Copy link
Contributor

@mvz mvz commented Oct 20, 2022

The changes in version 1.0.1 blocked the option of specifying both allowing and rejecting on the content type matcher. It turns out this was not necessary for fixing the slowness, since that was caused by the default value of rejecting using the Marcel types.

This changes adds back the option of using allowing and rejecting together.

@mvz mvz mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2022
@mvz
Copy link
Contributor Author

mvz commented Oct 20, 2022

It looks like the vips installations failed. I can't restart those jobs, maybe someone else can?

@igorkasyanchuk
Copy link
Owner

@gr8bit as usual want to check with you this PR (also If you can add me in Linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/igorkasyanchuk/ so we can discuss something :))

Copy link
Collaborator

@gr8bit gr8bit left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve these changes (aka reverts ;)) as well. Most important for me was @sobrinho's given approval on that matter.

Ready to be merged! :)

@igorkasyanchuk igorkasyanchuk merged commit 2e20c67 into igorkasyanchuk:master Oct 22, 2022
@igorkasyanchuk
Copy link
Owner

1.0.2 released! thanks to everyone!

@mvz mvz deleted the allowing-and-rejecting branch October 22, 2022 12:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants