-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 373
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Install non-dev SDL packages by default #3655
Conversation
SDL 1.2 and SDL 2 don't conflict
Add -d flag to install development packages.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @qarkai , I left one comment. Could you please reply to it?
Also fix macOS spelling in README
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @qarkai I just left one question, please take a look when it will be convenient for you.
Hi @qarkai and @oleg-derevenetz , I remember there was a reason why we had to remove SDL 1 if we install SDL 2. I'll check it soon. |
@ihhub I'm not sure about Ubuntu, but on macOS I have both SDL1 and SDL2 libs installed (from MacPorts) without any issues, so I can switch between SDL1 and SDL2 just by adding/removing |
@qarkai , a bunch of thanks for improving the project! |
Add separate scripts to install development packages.
Also don't remove other version of SDL before installation.
Fixes #2599.