Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Admin Console reports osm region as installed when it isn't #229

Closed
tim-moody opened this issue Jun 30, 2019 · 14 comments
Closed

Admin Console reports osm region as installed when it isn't #229

tim-moody opened this issue Jun 30, 2019 · 14 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@tim-moody
Copy link
Contributor

after selecting en-osm-omt_middle_east_2017-07-03_v0.23/en-osm-omt_middle_east_2017-07-03_v0.23.zip I selected South America and got alert that already installed.

@georgejhunt
Copy link
Contributor

I think this points to a bug. My code does not silently ignore checkboxes that are already installed -- and the alert probably does not display which region is already installed -- leading to confusion.

@holta holta changed the title Admin Concole reports osm region as installed when it isn't Admin Console reports osm region as installed when it isn't Jun 30, 2019
@tim-moody tim-moody self-assigned this Jun 30, 2019
@tim-moody
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure what to say. The previous version did not have this problem. Multiple regions could be installed at once. Those already installed were silently skipped. This version can install one region at a time, but any installed region will mark all as installed.

We plan to rewrite this later as the data and ui both have planned revisions.

My vote is to go back to what we had before.

@georgejhunt
Copy link
Contributor

georgejhunt commented Jun 30, 2019 via email

@georgejhunt
Copy link
Contributor

georgejhunt commented Jun 30, 2019 via email

@tim-moody
Copy link
Contributor Author

it won't. it will mark both as installed

@georgejhunt
Copy link
Contributor

georgejhunt commented Jun 30, 2019 via email

@tim-moody
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just so I'm clear, will the functionality be different in any way from what was there before?

@georgejhunt
Copy link
Contributor

georgejhunt commented Jun 30, 2019 via email

@georgejhunt
Copy link
Contributor

georgejhunt commented Jun 30, 2019 via email

@georgejhunt
Copy link
Contributor

georgejhunt commented Jun 30, 2019 via email

@tim-moody
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have not yet heard any reason not to go back to what was there before.

@georgejhunt
Copy link
Contributor

georgejhunt commented Jul 1, 2019 via email

@holta
Copy link
Member

holta commented Jan 4, 2020

@georgejhunt is this still an issue?

(Or can I close parent ticket iiab/iiab#1793 now?)

@holta
Copy link
Member

holta commented Jan 4, 2020

@georgejhunt suggests we close this and parent tkt iiab/iiab#1793, as he wrote up here: iiab/iiab#1793 (comment)

@holta holta closed this as completed Jan 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants