Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement link checker and other server side validation on Travis #11

Open
jmatsushita opened this issue Feb 12, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

Comments

@jmatsushita
Copy link
Member

Feeding into #7 implementing a server side link checker would be a good PoC. What would be even better is an isomorphic link checker.

@jmatsushita
Copy link
Member Author

Validating keys for SPAR standard compliance would be another client side/server side validator need. #12

@jmatsushita
Copy link
Member Author

Another possible CI test that would be useful if the management of tags is open, it provide feedback on sparseness of tags to help improve the usability and relevance of more fluidly defined and evolving taxonomies.

@jmatsushita
Copy link
Member Author

@gembarrett Would love to hear your thoughts on how to include style guide as a validator!

jmatsushita added a commit to contentascode/docsmith-init-jekyll that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2016
@jmatsushita
Copy link
Member Author

Given how Travis actually only shows a canned The Travis CI build failed message on pull requests via the Commit Status API, it might be better (and more in line with the overall micro-service approach) to develop (or wrap or automate) our own CI service this would help in being able to do browser based tests (although might still need some isomorphic smarts or local deployment to deal with offline use).

@jmatsushita
Copy link
Member Author

It's working on the init project!

image

image

jmatsushita added a commit to contentascode/docsmith-init-jekyll that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2016
@jmatsushita
Copy link
Member Author

The ProseMirror linting demo is awesome and MarkdownLint is interesting.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant