-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 188
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
measurement concern of the system #17
Comments
hello, |
Thanks for the link with Audi Lidar, it was interesting. I think that it is possible to avoid interference form your first question only in optical/mechanical way - by placing isolation mechanical parts. Your design is rally interesting! Are you planning to make it Open Source? |
Unfortunately current lidar design and product only for commercial use, did you ever think about any commercial possiblity of your design or product? I think this market still has a strong potential. |
"did you ever think about any commercial possiblity of your design or product?" |
I think the advantage of LD06 is small size and cheap price, it's a very competitive product, but the technical design is poor, the parameters and performance are not clear enough or as good as they say. |
Hello. |
hello, you have done a great job on this project! I'm working on a sanning lidar based on polygon mirror, I have a critical question. Did you ever meet an issue that when laser rays emit to the mirror, some rays are then directly deflected to the APD lens and received by APD? In that case the distance measured is not right due to this kind of light interference. In my design, I have to use a plastic isolator to block this interference. I don't know is there such interference in your design, or the lidar system is not effected by this kind of interference due to TIA threshold, or TDC principle, etc.
Thank you and good luck!
Kind regards,
Clint
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: