Java 17: Start using records #2377
Comments
|
@iluwatar can you assign this issue to me? |
|
Hey is this issue still in-progress, can I help with it?? |
|
Assigned to @ayushanand308, but maybe there's a way to split the work? |
|
I think @ayushanand308 is not quite active right now!! |
|
Reassigned to @bharathkalyans due to inactivity |
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. The issue will be unassigned if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
stale
bot
added
the
status: stale
stale
bot
removed
the
status: stale
…he record class
|
After finding out there is no assignee for this issue, I have refactored the codebase to use the record classes. It would be great if this issue can be re-assigned to me. I have opened a new Pull Request which needs to be reviewed. Following is the link to the PR: |
…use the recor… (#2505) * Issue #2377: The repository code has been refactored to use the record class * Issue #2377: Refactored according to the rules defined for the repo code * Issue #2377: Refactored according to the rules defined for the repo code * Issue #2377: Refactored according to the rules defined for the repo code
…ored to use the recor… (iluwatar#2505) * Issue iluwatar#2377: The repository code has been refactored to use the record class * Issue iluwatar#2377: Refactored according to the rules defined for the repo code * Issue iluwatar#2377: Refactored according to the rules defined for the repo code * Issue iluwatar#2377: Refactored according to the rules defined for the repo code
Available since Java 16, we can now use the record type for immutable classes. It's well described at https://dzone.com/articles/what-are-java-records
Acceptance criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: