Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Splits profiles-registry package into separate registry and assets packages #78

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 14, 2019
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion .eslintignore
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
/**/dist/**
/**/dist/**
node_modules
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion .eslintrc.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -40,7 +40,13 @@
"jest/no-focused-tests": "error",
"jest/no-identical-title": "error",
"jest/prefer-to-have-length": "warn",
"jest/valid-expect": "error"
"jest/valid-expect": "error",
"import/no-extraneous-dependencies": [
"error",
{
"packageDir": ["./packages/motion-controllers/", "./"]
}
]
}
}
]
Expand Down
22 changes: 1 addition & 21 deletions LICENSE.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,21 +1 @@
MIT License

Copyright (c) 2019 Amazon
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whatever the answer to "Which license is it anyways" comes back as, the answer to "Who is it attributed to" is "The Immersive Web Working Group". 😉


Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished
to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the next
paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the
Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS
OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF
OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
TODO Figure out what licence should be here
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good question! Gut reaction would be to say it should follow the spec work, which uses the W3C Software and Document License but given my experience with open source libs in the past that may drive people to not use it because it's not one of the well known licenses that their lawyers have given blanket approval for. Wonder if there's policy or precedent within the W3C for that?

(Side note: Because they grew out of personal code the WebXR samples are using an MIT license already, so if for whatever reason that's not cool with the W3C we should figure it out fast.)

651 changes: 8 additions & 643 deletions README.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.