-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Obscure date as well as location #678
Comments
This would be a great change to make. I've done this manually for some of my sensitive observations. |
I do it manually also and as mentioned elsewhere i concur we need this.
…On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Christopher Tracey < ***@***.***> wrote:
This would be a great change to make. I've done this manually for some of
my sensitive observations.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#678 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG1tk7deuTJnPtFfI4586PLHZxlQ1viqks5sr2MVgaJpZM4FxbJu>
.
--
============================
Charlie Hohn
Montpelier, Vermont
|
Since no one has responded to my questions here: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/inaturalist/lQ1MGeDK648/h6atI4LiBAAJ |
I guess we need to make sure the calendar doesn’t show a life list first
for it under the day either. Which is fine. I don’t think month needs to be
obscured. But I’ve already given plenty of feedback.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:21 PM Scott Loarie ***@***.***> wrote:
Since no one has responded to my questions here:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/inaturalist/lQ1MGeDK648/h6atI4LiBAAJ
I guess we're going with hiding month-day but leaving month?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#678 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG1tkzVgNqLCZkEGcy98aTzRLn2y5IHMks5stUSegaJpZM4FxbJu>
.
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
|
Obscuring by month sounds AWESOME. Please add. One issue I foresee is sorting observations by "date-time submitted", so this obscuration should be added there too. |
I agree that obscuring by day would be great. |
I believe this has been implemented by #3142 . |
On the google group at least here and I believe elsewhere there has been a desire expressed to have geoprivacy = obscured observations obscure not just the location but also the date so that they can't be located by looking at nearby observations.
This proposal is to address this by stripping the time so that obscured observations could only be located to the day of the observation but not the exact time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: