Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ISPN-10029 Invalidation locking is not clustered #6846

Conversation

danberindei
Copy link
Member

@danberindei danberindei commented Apr 11, 2019

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-10029

  • Lock tx keys on the primary owner
  • Keep locking non-tx keys only on the originator
  • InvalidationSharedStoreTest tests that global locks protect
    the shared store with pessimistic and optimistic locking
  • Require partition handling to be disabled in invalidation mode

@danberindei danberindei force-pushed the ISPN-10029_Invalidation_locking_is_not_clustered branch 2 times, most recently from bac1037 to 5cb3d72 Compare April 11, 2019 14:31
* Lock tx keys on the primary owner
* Keep locking non-tx keys only on the originator
* InvalidationSharedStoreTest tests that global locks protect
  the shared store with pessimistic and optimistic locking
* Require partition handling to be disabled in invalidation mode
@danberindei danberindei force-pushed the ISPN-10029_Invalidation_locking_is_not_clustered branch from 5cb3d72 to f8e5b23 Compare April 11, 2019 14:35
Copy link
Member

@pferraro pferraro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've verified this against my reproducer and against 9.4.x - to which I'll need this backported.

@pferraro
Copy link
Member

@tristantarrant @danberindei Any updates? This one is fairly critical (for me).

@ryanemerson ryanemerson merged commit 75893db into infinispan:master May 2, 2019
@danberindei danberindei deleted the ISPN-10029_Invalidation_locking_is_not_clustered branch May 3, 2019 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants