Add example Wolfi Dockerfiles #2438
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Adrian Mouat <adrian@chainguard.dev>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Mouat <adrian@chainguard.dev>
|
|
aliscott
approved these changes
May 1, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hey, I think I owe you this from a while back.
Here's a PR with wolfi versions of the Dockerfiles.
Dockerfile.wolfiis a straight port from the regular Dockerfile.Dockerfile.wolfi-ciis a straight port ofDockerfile.ci. You should find the wolfi images have less vulns, though there does seem to be a couple from the infracost libsand also some from libssl (which seems to be an issue with our openssh-client package that I'm currently investigating).(turns out the libssl vuln was my fault for building with a slightly old version of wolfi-base)Dockerfile.wolfi-latestis a bit more interesting - it only includes the latest versions of terraform and terragrunt (I did notice the versions specified in the Dockerfile are pretty out-of-date). This cuts the image down to 220MB and probably works for the majority of your users - it might be worth offering as an alternative image?Anyway, thought you might find it interesting!