The "File-Set Identification" module's information entity is not parsed correctly

[johndgiese]

Bug description

The "File-Set Identification" module's information entity is not parsed correctly.

Steps for reproduction

Visit:

https://dicom.innolitics.com/ciods/basic-directory/file-set-identification

Expected behavior

The module's information entity would be present, instead of the string "null."

Additional context (e.g. screenshots)

[russellkan]

There actually isn't an "Information Entity" column in these tables: http://dicom.nema.org/dicom/2013/output/chtml/part03/sect_F.3.html

Compared to all the other tables: http://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part03/sect_A.75.3.html

[johndgiese]

Ahh, I see! It almost seems like the "Basic Directory" IOD doesn't belong on the page, since it is just an IOD and is not a CIOD like the other top-level nodes on the page.

[russellkan]

Should I remove it then? This was added because an issue mentioned that there were missing attributes/tags (that appear to only exist in this IOD)

[johndgiese]

Ahh, I see---that makes sense. As we have done in other places, I don't think perfect consistency is necessary. I think we should remove the "- null" from the modules, but otherwise keep as is. What do you think?

[russellkan]

That makes sense to me.

[russellkan]

Update: Instead of just removing the "- null", we can use the IOD name as the "information entity" since "Basic Directory" is a single IOD rather than a CIOD.