Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Pool owners and pool reward accounts #189

Closed
JaredCorduan opened this issue Jan 14, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

Pool owners and pool reward accounts #189

JaredCorduan opened this issue Jan 14, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
@JaredCorduan
Labels
🇩🇪 berlin-review issues originating from the Berlin internal review 📜 formal-spec
Milestone
LaTex spec v1.2

Comments

@JaredCorduan
Copy link
Contributor

Add support for pool owners:

  • Their stake is counted toward the pledge
  • each owner must provide a witness in the registration cert transaction.
  • each owner gets no rewards in the corresponding reward address
  • all owner rewards go to the reward address specified in the pool reg cert.
@JaredCorduan JaredCorduan added 📜 formal-spec 🇩🇪 berlin-review issues originating from the Berlin internal review labels Jan 14, 2019
@JaredCorduan JaredCorduan self-assigned this Jan 14, 2019
@JaredCorduan JaredCorduan mentioned this issue Jan 24, 2019
Merged
@JaredCorduan JaredCorduan added this to the LaTex spec v1.2 milestone Jan 31, 2019
nc6 pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 19, 2020
@iohk-bors @dnadales
Merge #355
aa76943 
355: Implement UPIREG and UPIVOTE rules r=dnadales a=dnadales

Part of #189.

Co-authored-by: Damian Nadales <damian.nadales@iohk.io>
nc6 pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 19, 2020
@iohk-bors @dnadales
Merge #407
e00af51 
407: Finish the implementation of the update mechanism. r=dnadales a=dnadales

- Implement `PVBUMP`, `UPIEND` and `UPIEC` rules
- Set the update proposal time to live to `ppUpdateImplicit`.
- Use named field puns in the interface more consistently.
- Add an environment to `Cardano.Chain.Update.Validation.Registration`
- Use explicit exports in the update modules.

Closes #189.

Co-authored-by: Damian Nadales <damian.nadales@iohk.io>
teodanciu pushed a commit to bienpulenta/cardano-ledger that referenced this issue Apr 19, 2023
@newhoggy
Merge pull request IntersectMBO#189 from input-output-hk/remove-stack…
dfa012e 
…-files

Remove stack files
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@JaredCorduan JaredCorduan

Labels
🇩🇪 berlin-review issues originating from the Berlin internal review 📜 formal-spec
Projects
None yet
Milestone
LaTex spec v1.2
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@JaredCorduan