-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC: isbns and dois in Literature schema #1349
Comments
The only issue I have is that ISBNs in publication info mean that the given document is a chapter inside a the referred book. Instead when the ISBN is in its own field it means that this record is about the book itself. At that point we should also have the imprint information (i.e. place, editor and year). At the same time we have the concept of |
@annetteholtkamp what is the actual way we relate a book chapter to its book? |
773__0 contains the recid of the book. Usually the 773 field for a book chapter contains just One could also imagine using the DOI of the book to refer to it. In principle it would be great if many identifiers are allowed to save cataloguers the work of looking up the recid. We also have links via report number. E.g..
On Jul 20, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Samuele Kaplun <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: @annetteholtkamphttps://github.com/annetteholtkamp what is the actual way we relate a book chapter to its book? — |
@kaplun if you are not working on this, move back to ready and unassign 👍 |
You are going to work on it? |
Are you asking or assigning? ;), but in any case, move to ready then, if you want me to work on it assign it to me too. |
You self assign-it :P |
This looks like a content decision. I think that @michamos should look at it and decide. |
I am not sure I understand the issue. In |
That's a nice idea. The issue probably never came up before. But more and more books have a DOI, e.g. Springer books and proceedings. So it would be very useful if we can refer to a parent via its DOI.
- Annette
On May 11, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Micha Moskovic <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote:
I am not sure I understand the issue. In publication_info, parent_isbn, parent_record and parent_record_number are defined. Maybe we also need parent_doi which is not currently defined?
@annetteholtkamp<https://github.com/annetteholtkamp> ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#1349 (comment)>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AM1-O8XgQZh6rxcB2vnsxlmxdVdGJndgks5r4yCvgaJpZM4JPoVR>.
|
This issue was moved to inspirehep/inspire-schemas#210 |
Currently we have these arrays inside the schema:
dois
isbns
publication_info
publication_info
also has anisbn
field. I think it might be better to move everything that is publication related withinpublication_info
. If we have only an ISBN then the publication info will contain only the ISBN information.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: