You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, sorry for a pedantic question, but could you clarify the dual licensing aspect.
Can downstream recipients of this code choose to license it just under 3-Clause BSD terms or just under GPLv2 terms. Or is dual licensing meant to be the combination of 3-Clause BSD AND GPLv2 terms.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Yes, downstream recipients of this code can choose to license it just under 3-Clause BSD terms or just under GPLv2 terms.
It is up to you to choose the license that suits you better.
Upon receiving a request to clarify the license of the `ittapi-rs` crate, this change modifies the `Cargo.toml` to include the licenses used by this repository. As clarified by intel#12, either license can be used.
Hi, sorry for a pedantic question, but could you clarify the dual licensing aspect.
Can downstream recipients of this code choose to license it just under 3-Clause BSD terms or just under GPLv2 terms. Or is dual licensing meant to be the combination of 3-Clause BSD AND GPLv2 terms.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: