Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Can I use SR-IOV on raptor lake? #39

Closed
ShCby opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Can I use SR-IOV on raptor lake? #39

ShCby opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@ShCby
Copy link

ShCby commented Feb 9, 2023

I'm considering whether to upgrade my G7400. Can the i5-13400 use SR-IOV?
@ShCby ShCby closed this as completed Mar 26, 2023
sys-oak pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 10, 2024
@idosch @gregkh
mlxsw: spectrum_acl_tcam: Fix incorrect list API usage
ab4ecfb 
[ Upstream commit b377add0f0117409c418ddd6504bd682ebe0bf79 ]

Both the function that migrates all the chunks within a region and the
function that migrates all the entries within a chunk call
list_first_entry() on the respective lists without checking that the
lists are not empty. This is incorrect usage of the API, which leads to
the following warning [1].

Fix by returning if the lists are empty as there is nothing to migrate
in this case.

[1]
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6437 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c:1266 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x1f1/0>
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 6437 Comm: kworker/0:37 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-custom-00883-g94a65f079ef6 #39
Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019
Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work
RIP: 0010:mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x1f1/0x2c0
[...]
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x6c/0x4a0
 process_one_work+0x151/0x370
 worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0
 kthread+0xd0/0x100
 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
 </TASK>

Fixes: 6f9579d ("mlxsw: spectrum_acl: Remember where to continue rehash migration")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Alexander Zubkov <green@qrator.net>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4628e9a22d1d84818e28310abbbc498e7bc31bc9.1713797103.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
sys-oak pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2024
@awilliam @gregkh
vfio/pci: Collect hot-reset devices to local buffer
618fbf4 
[ Upstream commit f6944d4a0b87c16bc34ae589169e1ded3d4db08e ]

Lockdep reports the below circular locking dependency issue.  The
mmap_lock acquisition while holding pci_bus_sem is due to the use of
copy_to_user() from within a pci_walk_bus() callback.

Building the devices array directly into the user buffer is only for
convenience.  Instead we can allocate a local buffer for the array,
bounded by the number of devices on the bus/slot, fill the device
information into this local buffer, then copy it into the user buffer
outside the bus walk callback.

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.9.0-rc5+ #39 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
CPU 0/KVM/4113 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff99a609ee18a8 (&vdev->vma_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core]

but task is already holding lock:
ffff99a243a052a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vaddr_get_pfns+0x3f/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1]

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}:
       __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90
       lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0
       __might_fault+0x5c/0x80
       _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x60
       vfio_pci_fill_devs+0x9f/0x130 [vfio_pci_core]
       vfio_pci_walk_wrapper+0x45/0x60 [vfio_pci_core]
       __pci_walk_bus+0x6b/0xb0
       vfio_pci_ioctl_get_pci_hot_reset_info+0x10b/0x1d0 [vfio_pci_core]
       vfio_pci_core_ioctl+0x1cb/0x400 [vfio_pci_core]
       vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0x7e/0x140 [vfio]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0
       do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

-> #2 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{4:4}:
       __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90
       lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0
       down_read+0x3e/0x160
       pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus.part.0+0x33/0x2d0
       pci_reset_bus+0xdd/0x160
       vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset+0x256/0x270 [vfio_pci_core]
       vfio_pci_ioctl_pci_hot_reset_groups+0x1a3/0x280 [vfio_pci_core]
       vfio_pci_core_ioctl+0x3b5/0x400 [vfio_pci_core]
       vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0x7e/0x140 [vfio]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0
       do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

-> #1 (&vdev->memory_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90
       lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0
       down_write+0x3b/0xc0
       vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock+0x1c/0x30 [vfio_pci_core]
       vfio_basic_config_write+0x281/0x340 [vfio_pci_core]
       vfio_config_do_rw+0x1fa/0x300 [vfio_pci_core]
       vfio_pci_config_rw+0x75/0xe50 [vfio_pci_core]
       vfio_pci_rw+0xea/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core]
       vfs_write+0xea/0x520
       __x64_sys_pwrite64+0x90/0xc0
       do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

-> #0 (&vdev->vma_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       check_prev_add+0xeb/0xcc0
       validate_chain+0x465/0x530
       __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90
       lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0
       __mutex_lock+0x97/0xde0
       vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core]
       __do_fault+0x31/0x160
       do_pte_missing+0x65/0x3b0
       __handle_mm_fault+0x303/0x720
       handle_mm_fault+0x10f/0x460
       fixup_user_fault+0x7f/0x1f0
       follow_fault_pfn+0x66/0x1c0 [vfio_iommu_type1]
       vaddr_get_pfns+0xf2/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1]
       vfio_pin_pages_remote+0x348/0x4e0 [vfio_iommu_type1]
       vfio_pin_map_dma+0xd2/0x330 [vfio_iommu_type1]
       vfio_dma_do_map+0x2c0/0x440 [vfio_iommu_type1]
       vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl+0xc5/0x1d0 [vfio_iommu_type1]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0
       do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &vdev->vma_lock --> pci_bus_sem --> &mm->mmap_lock

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

block dm-0: the capability attribute has been deprecated.
       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  rlock(&mm->mmap_lock);
                               lock(pci_bus_sem);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_lock);
  lock(&vdev->vma_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by CPU 0/KVM/4113:
 #0: ffff99a25f294888 (&iommu->lock#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: vfio_dma_do_map+0x60/0x440 [vfio_iommu_type1]
 #1: ffff99a243a052a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vaddr_get_pfns+0x3f/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 4113 Comm: CPU 0/KVM Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5+ #39
Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge T640/04WYPY, BIOS 2.15.1 06/16/2022
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xa0
 check_noncircular+0x131/0x150
 check_prev_add+0xeb/0xcc0
 ? add_chain_cache+0x10a/0x2f0
 ? __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90
 validate_chain+0x465/0x530
 __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90
 lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0
 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core]
 ? lock_is_held_type+0x9a/0x110
 __mutex_lock+0x97/0xde0
 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core]
 ? lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0
 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core]
 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core]
 vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core]
 __do_fault+0x31/0x160
 do_pte_missing+0x65/0x3b0
 __handle_mm_fault+0x303/0x720
 handle_mm_fault+0x10f/0x460
 fixup_user_fault+0x7f/0x1f0
 follow_fault_pfn+0x66/0x1c0 [vfio_iommu_type1]
 vaddr_get_pfns+0xf2/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1]
 vfio_pin_pages_remote+0x348/0x4e0 [vfio_iommu_type1]
 vfio_pin_map_dma+0xd2/0x330 [vfio_iommu_type1]
 vfio_dma_do_map+0x2c0/0x440 [vfio_iommu_type1]
 vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl+0xc5/0x1d0 [vfio_iommu_type1]
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0
 do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170
 ? rcu_core+0x8d/0x250
 ? __lock_release+0x5e/0x160
 ? rcu_core+0x8d/0x250
 ? lock_release+0x5f/0x120
 ? sched_clock+0xc/0x30
 ? sched_clock_cpu+0xb/0x190
 ? irqtime_account_irq+0x40/0xc0
 ? __local_bh_enable+0x54/0x60
 ? __do_softirq+0x315/0x3ca
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x97/0x140
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7f8300d0357b
Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b 49 c7 c4 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d 4c 89 e0 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 75 68 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f82ef3fb948 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f8300d0357b
RDX: 00007f82ef3fb990 RSI: 0000000000003b71 RDI: 0000000000000023
RBP: 00007f82ef3fb9c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000561b7e0bcac2
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000200000000 R14: 0000381800000000 R15: 0000000000000000
 </TASK>

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240503143138.3562116-1-alex.williamson@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ShCby