Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is there no easy way to get users.list() to support pagination? #89

Closed
tim-kos opened this issue May 9, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Is there no easy way to get users.list() to support pagination? #89

tim-kos opened this issue May 9, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@tim-kos
Copy link

tim-kos commented May 9, 2016

Currently users.list() does not allow any arguments other than the callback function. How can I tell it to give me page 2, etc. ?

@bobjflong
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tim-kos - you can pass the page object returned to the nextPage function https://github.com/intercom/intercom-node#pagination

@michael-watson
Copy link

This no longer works, get an error that the URI isn't set. It seems you need to construct the URL and pass it as an object instead of the pages object now

@eXeDK
Copy link

eXeDK commented Aug 20, 2020

@bobjflong please re-open or just state that it doesn't work anymore.

@bobjflong
Copy link
Contributor

bobjflong commented Aug 20, 2020 via email

@eXeDK
Copy link

eXeDK commented Aug 20, 2020

Fair enough @bobjflong, thanks for the swift reply

fern-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
Bumps [yaml](https://github.com/eemeli/yaml) from 2.2.1 to 2.2.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/eemeli/yaml/releases)
- [Commits](eemeli/yaml@v2.2.1...v2.2.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: yaml
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants