TIP-19 Dust Protection Based on Byte Costs #39
Conversation
text/0039-dust-protection-based-on-byte-costs/0039-dust-protection-based-on-byte-costs.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Minimum state rent virtual byte counts are incorrect given that the calculations still work with uint16 for denoting the feature blocks slice length (instead of uint8). |
lzpap
changed the title
|
the link is changed to https://github.com/muXxer/protocol-rfcs/blob/master/tips/TIP-0019/tip-0019.md |
| <tr> | ||
| <th>Name</th> | ||
| <th>Description</th> | ||
| <th>Weight</th> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe we should specify that these can be floating point / fractional values. vbyte_cost on the other hand is of type integer, right? Maybe we should specify that somewhere too?
tips/TIP-0019/tip-0019.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| Another solution is to convert all `SigLockedDustAllowanceOutput` into `BasicOutputs` and leave the `SigLockedSingleOutput` below 1 MIOTA untouched. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Unresolved questions |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When consider merging this TIP, we should remove this section.
Are there even still open? I guess we obviously have to define some v_byte_cost value so we could maybe just remove the entire section.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should remove this section as you said because any parameter values are subject to be put into a separate TIP or the actual network configuration anyway, so this is not the place to put it.
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Welz <welzwo@gmail.com>
This RFC describes a new dust protection mechanism that prevents bloating of the IOTA ledger database.
Rendered Version
The scripts for byte cost calculations can be found here.