Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Melodic] #38

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 6, 2019
Merged

[Melodic] #38

merged 13 commits into from
Aug 6, 2019

Conversation

benmaidel
Copy link
Member

@benmaidel benmaidel commented Jul 30, 2019

ref ipa320/care-o-bot#52

superseeds #37

I've removed the last commit from @ompugao concerning the pid interface because of @fmessmer comment #37 (review)

This should be compatible with kinetic and melodic if the hardware_interface prefix is used for all transmissions.

fmessmer
fmessmer previously approved these changes Aug 1, 2019
Copy link
Member

@fmessmer fmessmer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can confirm that the plugin still works for kinetic - when using https://github.com/ipa320/cob_common/pull/271

fmessmer
fmessmer previously approved these changes Aug 1, 2019
@fmessmer fmessmer dismissed their stale review August 2, 2019 08:59

see next comment

Copy link
Member

@fmessmer fmessmer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see the following warning:

[ WARN] [1564736237.339278403, 0.469000000]: The default_robot_hw_sim plugin is using the Joint::SetPosition method without preserving the link velocity.
[ WARN] [1564736237.339305046, 0.469000000]: As a result, gravity will not be simulated correctly for your model.
[ WARN] [1564736237.339321186, 0.469000000]: Please set gazebo_pid parameters, switch to the VelocityJointInterface or EffortJointInterface, or upgrade to Gazebo 9.
[ WARN] [1564736237.339335329, 0.469000000]: For details, see https://github.com/ros-simulation/gazebo_ros_pkgs/issues/612

this might not necessarily be related to this PR, but I would like to investigate before merging

floweisshardt
floweisshardt previously approved these changes Aug 2, 2019
@fmessmer
Copy link
Member

fmessmer commented Aug 5, 2019

maybe we can do something like this: ros-simulation/gazebo_ros_pkgs#550
to be compatible with both with and without prefix

@fmessmer
Copy link
Member

fmessmer commented Aug 5, 2019

@benmaidel please re-test this branch with melodic simulation to help me verify the dual-distro compatibility...thx

@fmessmer fmessmer merged commit 40c05ab into ipa320:kinetic_dev Aug 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants