Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update is-ipfs to the latest version 🚀 #196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2017
Merged

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Feb 1, 2017

Version 0.3.0 of is-ipfs just got published.

Dependency is-ipfs
Current Version 0.2.1
Type dependency

The version 0.3.0 is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of is-ipfs.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Commits

The new version differs by 6 commits .

  • c1e342d chore: release version v0.3.0
  • 2b4c91b chore: update contributors
  • 3c65677 fix(lint): unnecessary escape
  • 8e85bd7 feat: update scripts for release
  • 78cb637 Merge pull request #11 from diasdavid/chore/update-deps
  • 9b4bece chore: update those deps!

See the full diff.

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 38.587% when pulling 98b6328 on greenkeeper/is-ipfs-0.3.0 into b95b3ea on master.

@lidel lidel merged commit 0a9ec55 into master Feb 1, 2017
@lidel lidel deleted the greenkeeper/is-ipfs-0.3.0 branch February 1, 2017 15:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants