Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't check for wx in the test suite. #4641

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2013

Conversation

takluyver
Copy link
Member

An interaction between wx and threads was blocking certain Unix signals,
causing an unrelated test to fail for me.

We were only checking for wx to exclude the inputhookwx module from the
test run. It contains no tests anyway, so we may as well just exclude it
in all cases.

An interaction between wx and threads was blocking certain Unix signals,
causing an unrelated test to fail for me.

We were only checking for wx to exclude the inputhookwx module from the
test run. It contains no tests anyway, so we may as well just exclude it
in all cases.
@minrk
Copy link
Member

minrk commented Dec 4, 2013

👍

@ivanov
Copy link
Member

ivanov commented Dec 4, 2013

travis failure on python3 was a "socket already in use" - restarted the job

minrk added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2013
Don't check for wx in the test suite.

An interaction between wx and threads was blocking certain Unix signals,
causing an unrelated test to fail for me.

We were only checking for wx to exclude the inputhookwx module from the
test run. It contains no tests anyway, so we may as well just exclude it
in all cases.
@minrk minrk merged commit 1f6a2c2 into ipython:master Dec 4, 2013
mattvonrocketstein pushed a commit to mattvonrocketstein/ipython that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2014
Don't check for wx in the test suite.

An interaction between wx and threads was blocking certain Unix signals,
causing an unrelated test to fail for me.

We were only checking for wx to exclude the inputhookwx module from the
test run. It contains no tests anyway, so we may as well just exclude it
in all cases.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants