stop supporting .workerfile and Workerfile, use just .worker

[romand]

by numerous requests

[romand]

@iced any objections?

[iced]

Why to?

[treeder]

Because we don't support them.
On Aug 17, 2012 5:58 AM, "Andrew Kirilenko" notifications@github.com
wrote:

Why to?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/104#issuecomment-7817127.

[romand]

.workerfile is just excessive alias for .worker, no use, little harm
But Workerfile introduces a lot of ambiguity:

• is it executed if workerfile provided in constructor? if yes, before or after it?
• is it executed, if name provided in constructor and .worker exists?
• if name provided in Workerfile, is .worker executed?

IMHO Workerfile is error-prone and should be wiped out

[treeder]

+1

[iced]

done