isar is amazing (new benchmark)

[msxenon]

I have just checked using this benchmark
and I got objectbox (^1.4.0-dev.0)
was 1.5x faster than Isar DB Async (2.0.0); (with a little UI Lag)

BUT Isar Async is pretty cool while it's fast and not blocking the UI

checkout the demo video and the screenshot below
https://github.com/msxenon/flutter-db-benchmarks

[simc]

That's cool but the numbers seem a bit off. Isar sync should be much faster than async and very similar to objectbox. It's important that you don't wrap sync isar into a future. otherwise you won't get the correct results.

[msxenon]

alrighty, will double check that executors

[msxenon]

Well, I tried using “FutureOr” instead of “Future” and it was the same.
BTW in the benchmark they are all using the same parent class ExecutorBase and still objectbox is faster.

Finally: for using it in a production app, performance is more important than speed. So Isar Async here wins 🏆

[simc]

Interesting but I guess it makes sense that for batch operations there is not a big difference. On my device (ios sim), Isar is still quite similar to objectbox 🤷🏼‍♂️

[msxenon]

Sure it differs from one device to another; I am testing on a low-end tablet to see the worst-case scenario

[simc]

that's a good hint. maybe there are some improvements that can be made for low-end devices 🤔