Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo where request.method is request.path #498

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

hubt
Copy link

@hubt hubt commented Jul 25, 2017

There is a similar problem in the docs.

There is a similar problem in the docs.
@istio-testing
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @hubt. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a istio member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ldemailly
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test
I have some deja vu somehow on this change, cc @douglas-reid

@istio-merge-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hubt
We suggest the following additional approvers:

Assign the PR to them by writing /assign in a comment when ready.

No associated issue. Update pull-request body to add a reference to an issue, or get approval with /approve no-issue

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ rules:
source: source.labels["app"] | "unknown"
target: target.service | "unknown"
service: target.labels["app"] | "unknown"
method: request.path | "unknown"
method: request.method | "unknown"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this was intentional -- method is just a bit overloaded. (it was meant to get at the API method of the service /ratings v. the http method GET). But I have no strong feelings on the need for it either way.

@sebastienvas
Copy link
Contributor

Should we close this ?

@yutongz
Copy link
Contributor

yutongz commented Aug 16, 2017

/test all

3 similar comments
@yutongz
Copy link
Contributor

yutongz commented Aug 17, 2017

/test all

@yutongz
Copy link
Contributor

yutongz commented Aug 17, 2017

/test all

@yutongz
Copy link
Contributor

yutongz commented Aug 17, 2017

/test all

@ldemailly
Copy link
Contributor

closing but reopen if I'm reading this wrong

@ldemailly ldemailly closed this Sep 2, 2017
mandarjog pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2017
* Reproducing the loop-back auth error.

* Add CA.

* Small fixes.

* Small fixes.
howardjohn added a commit to howardjohn/istio that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2020
antonioberben pushed a commit to antonioberben/istio that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2024
Signed-off-by: Narsing Metpally <nmetpally@axon.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants