status: check if target is missing both in cache and remote

[nik123]

Fixes #4383

• ❗ I have followed the Contributing to DVC checklist.

• 📖 If this PR requires documentation updates, I have created a separate PR (or issue, at least) in dvc.org and linked it here.

iterative/dvc.org#1701

P.S.: I have also updated tests to make sure if targets missing both in cache and remote are handled properly bit these updates are dirty. So please inform me if there is a better way to implement them.

[efiop]

Thank you @nik123 ! 🙏

[jorgeorpinel]

Thanks for this contribution @nik123. Coming to comment here before deciding how to address iterative/dvc.org/issues/1701.

From iterative/dvc.org#1701:

Here as an example output for dvc status -c dvc 1.6.0+adce62 the missing state looks like this:

$ dvc status -c -R .
WARNING: Some of the cache files do not exist neither locally nor on remote. Missing cache files:
name: data-in-cache2-not-in-remote.txt, md5: 599b9eea7a2c4f97be18c077d2df4789
	new:                data-in-cache-1-not-in-remote.txt
	missing:            data-in-cache-2-not-in-remote.txt

If missing is now an expected status, the WARNING is probably no longer needed. So it could just output something like:

$ dvc status -c  # Assumes default remote exists, otherwise -r myremote
new:                data-in-cache-1-not-in-remote.txt
missing:            data-in-cache2-not-in-remote.txt

[nik123]

@jorgeorpinel I think you are right, there should be no "warning" message. However, this warning should stay in other commands (push, pull, fetch, gc).

I think I can achieve it by adding log_missing=True param into dvc.data_cloud.DataCloud.status and passing it all the way down to

dvc/dvc/cache/local.py

Line 202 in adce620

self._log_missing_caches(dict(dir_status, **file_status))

I'm not sure there should be separate issue. Probably just reopen #4383. @efiop what do you think?