Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Meta.toString() should call Meta.ddl() #9428

Closed
lukaseder opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 0 comments
Closed

Meta.toString() should call Meta.ddl() #9428

lukaseder opened this issue Oct 23, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
@lukaseder
Labels
C: Functionality E: All Editions P: Medium R: Fixed T: Enhancement
Projects
3.13 DDL interpretation
Milestone
Version 3.13.0

Comments

@lukaseder
Copy link
Member

A really cool debugging feature (at least for small schemas) would be to let Meta.toString() call Meta.ddl().

We have to be careful as this might turn out to be quite a costly operation in some Meta implementations, especially when:

  • They contain a lot of objects (let's wait for user feedback)
  • They are backed by JDBC DatabaseMetaData (we'll prevent that)
@lukaseder lukaseder added this to the Version 3.13.0 milestone Oct 23, 2019
@lukaseder lukaseder self-assigned this Oct 23, 2019
@lukaseder lukaseder added this to To do in 3.13 DDL interpretation via automation Oct 23, 2019
@lukaseder lukaseder changed the title Meta.toString() shoudl call Meta.ddl() Meta.toString() should call Meta.ddl() Oct 23, 2019
lukaseder added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2019
@lukaseder
[#9428] Meta.toString() should call Meta.ddl()
86ea965
3.13 DDL interpretation automation moved this from To do to Done Oct 23, 2019
@lukaseder lukaseder mentioned this issue Oct 23, 2019
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lukaseder lukaseder

Labels
C: Functionality E: All Editions P: Medium R: Fixed T: Enhancement
Projects
3.13 DDL interpretation
  
Done
Milestone
Version 3.13.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lukaseder