Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jack2 latent_client.c #14

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 30, 2021
Merged

Jack2 latent_client.c #14

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 30, 2021

Conversation

dvzrv
Copy link
Collaborator

@dvzrv dvzrv commented Nov 26, 2021

example-clients/latent_client.c:
Merge the jack2 version of latent_client.c as its initial version
diverted from the original example-clients.

Relates to #9

example-clients/latent_client.c:
Remove latent_client.c as the jack2 version of the file has been applied
already with changes applied. This makes a clean rebase on top of the
orginal version not possible.
@dvzrv dvzrv added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 26, 2021
@dvzrv dvzrv requested a review from falkTX November 26, 2021 13:50
@dvzrv dvzrv self-assigned this Nov 26, 2021
@@ -21,30 +21,36 @@ jack_default_audio_sample_t *delay_line;
jack_nframes_t delay_index;
jack_nframes_t latency = 1024;

#ifdef WIN32
#define jack_sleep(val) Sleep((val))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this macro is only used once, so I dont really think it makes sense. plus the -1*1000 for !win32 case makes it be very weird..

will remove this part to be more in line with the other examples, which do not use a macro

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add a ticket for this?

@falkTX falkTX merged commit 8af4176 into main Dec 30, 2021
@falkTX falkTX deleted the jack2_latent_client branch December 30, 2021 01:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants